← back

Tech Relocation Guide

Compensation & Tax Analysis 2026

Baseline: Prague, Czech Republic — £200K gross

Target cities: London, New York, Tokyo, Singapore

Updated: May 21, 2026

Executive Summary

For tech work (systems engineering, HFT, crypto infrastructure), compensation must offset higher taxes and cost of living. This guide calculates the gross compensation multiplier needed to maintain the same after-tax purchasing power as Prague.

City Cost vs Prague Tax Burden Gross Multiplier Break-even
London +96% 36-40% total (£200K-£350K) 1.55x £310K
New York +142% 43-47% (fed+state+city) 1.95x $390K
Tokyo +12% 55% (income+residence) 1.30x ¥26M
Singapore +81% 24% + CPF capped 1.30x S$260K

Key insight: Singapore has the lowest tax burden but high cost of living. NYC has highest total burden (tax + cost). Tokyo is close to Prague in cost but has brutal combined tax (55%).

Decision Matrix

From Prague £200K Baseline

City Gross Needed Net After Tax Net Purchasing Power Rank
Prague £200K £140K £140K (baseline) 1
Singapore £260K £200K £110K 2
Tokyo £260K £143K £128K 3
London £310K £185K £94K 4
NYC £390K £220K £91K 5

High-Comp Role Analysis

Gattaca (London) — £350K gross

Income tax: £138,675
National Insurance: £9,011
Total tax: £147,686 (42.2% effective)
Net: £202,314
Purchasing power: £103K (÷1.96 cost multiplier)
Stay in Prague: Falls short by £37K net purchasing power

Gattaca (London) — £450K gross

Income tax: £183,675
National Insurance: £11,011
Total tax: £194,686 (43.3% effective)
Net: £255,314
Purchasing power: £130K (÷1.96 cost multiplier)
Stay in Prague: Falls short by £10K net purchasing power

Top HFT (NYC) — $500K gross

Net: ~$275K
Purchasing power: ~$114K
Stay in Prague: Falls short by ~$30K net purchasing power

Top HFT (NYC) — $650K gross

Net: ~$350K
Purchasing power: ~$145K
Move to NYC: Beats Prague by ~$10K + access to top HFT firms (Jane Street, HRT, Citadel)

Crypto/Web3 (Singapore) — S$300K gross

Net: ~S$230K
Purchasing power: ~S$127K
Stay in Prague: Falls short by ~S$15K net

Crypto/Web3 (Singapore) — S$350K+ gross

Net: ~S$265K
Purchasing power: ~S$146K
Move to Singapore: Best tax efficiency (24% + CPF capped). No capital gains tax on equity/token comp.

Japan HFT (Tokyo) — ¥30M gross

Net: ~¥16.5M
Purchasing power: ~¥14.7M
Stay in Prague: Falls short by ~¥3M despite Tokyo only being 12% more expensive

Why Tokyo punishes: 55% combined tax (45% income + 2.1% surtax + 10% residence) kills net savings.

TL;DR: Should You Move?

If you're offered... Should you move?
Gattaca (London) £350K ❌ No — £37K worse net purchasing power
Gattaca (London) £450K ❌ No — £10K worse net purchasing power
Top HFT (NYC) $500K ❌ No — $30K worse net purchasing power
Top HFT (NYC) $650K+ ✅ Yes — beats Prague by $10K+
HFT (Tokyo) ¥30M ❌ No — ¥3M worse despite similar cost
HFT (Tokyo) ¥35M+ ⚠️ Marginal — 55% tax is punishing
Crypto/Web3 (Singapore) S$300K ❌ No — S$15K worse net
Crypto/Web3 (Singapore) S$350K+ ✅ Yes — best tax efficiency wins

Golden Rule

From Prague £200K baseline: Need 1.3-2.0x gross depending on city to maintain purchasing power. Below that, you're taking a financial cut for resume/network value.

Winner cities at high comp: Singapore (S$350K+) and NYC ($650K+). London and Tokyo need exceptionally high offers (£450K+ / ¥35M+) to justify.

City Deep Dives

Prague (Baseline)

Taxation (2026)

Income tax:

Social + health insurance:

Combined effective: 26-34% depending on income band

Cost of Living

Monthly expenses (1-person):

London, UK

Taxation (2026/27)

Income tax brackets:

National Insurance:

Combined effective (income + NI):

Note: Personal allowance reduces by £1 for every £2 earned above £100K, creating an effective 60% marginal rate between £100K-£125K.

Cost of Living vs Prague

Overall: London is 96% more expensive than Prague

Key differences:

Compensation Multiplier

Prague £100K gross → £70K net → £35.7K purchasing power (÷1.96)
London needs £100K net → requires £200K gross at 42% effective
Multiplier: 1.55x gross compensation

Break-even: £310K+ gross in London to match Prague £200K lifestyle

Healthcare Costs

NHS (National Health Service):

vs Prague: Czech public health insurance ~£600/year, similar out-of-pocket costs

vs US: US employer plans: $500-$1,200/month premium + $1,500-$5,000 deductible + copays. Total out-of-pocket ~$3,000-$8,000/year even with insurance.

Special Considerations

New York City, USA

Taxation (2026)

Federal income tax: 10-37% (progressive, top rate at $578,125+)

New York State tax:

NYC city tax:

Combined effective (for $300K income):

Cost of Living vs Prague

Overall: NYC is 142% more expensive than Prague

Key differences:

Compensation Multiplier

Prague $100K gross → $70K net → $28.9K purchasing power (÷2.42)
NYC needs $120K net → requires $230K gross at 47% effective
Multiplier: 1.95x gross compensation

Break-even: $390K+ gross in NYC to match Prague $270K lifestyle

Healthcare Costs

US employer health insurance:

vs Prague: Czech public insurance ~$800/year, minimal out-of-pocket

Reality: US healthcare adds $5K-$10K/year hidden cost not in tax calculations

Special Considerations

Tokyo, Japan

Taxation (2026)

National income tax (7 brackets):

Surtax: 2.1% on national income tax (reconstruction surtax)

Residence tax (jūminzei):

Combined effective:

Cost of Living vs Prague

Overall: Tokyo is only 6-12% more expensive than Prague

Key differences:

Compensation Multiplier

Prague ¥15M gross → ¥10.5M net (30%) → ¥9.5M purchasing power (÷1.12)
Tokyo ¥15M gross → ¥8.25M net (45% effective) → ¥7.4M purchasing power
Multiplier: 1.30x gross compensation

Break-even: ¥26M+ gross in Tokyo to match Prague ¥27M lifestyle

Why Tokyo punishes: The 55% combined tax on high earners is brutal despite low cost increase.

Healthcare & Social Insurance

Employee Health Insurance (Shakai Hoken):

vs Prague: Czech insurance ~$800/year vs Japan ~$1,860/year (comparable)

Note: Japan NHI already included in the 55% total tax figure above (part of social insurance)

Special Considerations

Singapore

Taxation (2026)

Income tax (progressive, 0-24%):

CPF (Central Provident Fund):

Combined effective (for S$200K income):

Cost of Living vs Prague

Overall: Singapore is 81% more expensive than Prague

Key differences:

Compensation Multiplier

Prague S$150K gross → S$105K net (30%) → S$58K purchasing power (÷1.81)
Singapore S$150K gross → S$115K net (23% effective) → S$63.5K purchasing power
Multiplier: 1.30x gross compensation

Break-even: S$260K+ gross in Singapore to match Prague S$270K lifestyle

Why Singapore wins: Lowest tax burden (24% top rate + CPF capped) offsets the 81% cost increase better than other cities.

Healthcare Costs

MediSave (CPF Healthcare Account):

vs Prague: Singapore healthcare costs similar to Prague (public system efficient)

Key advantage: MediSave funded from CPF (already in 37% total burden), no additional premium like US

Special Considerations

Sources

Healthcare Comparisons

UK

USA (NYC)

Japan

Singapore

Cost of Living

Czech Republic