← back

Research

Deep dives, technical analysis, and system breakdowns

Pinned

πŸͺ¨ Crystals of Code
LLM generation = crystal growth (Boltzmann proof)

LLM generation and crystal growth are mathematically identical, proven by Boltzmann distribution. 10-level distillation of 200+ papers across statistical mechanics, crystallography, information theory, and ML. Code binds to APIs like molecules bind to substrates.

β†’ Full research

πŸ€– Agent Frameworks
8 systems β€’ 7 concepts β€’ 13 patterns

Comprehensive analysis of agent systems: arizuko, Claude Code, Cline, Devin, OpenHands, Cursor, Langchain, Autogen. Architectural trade-offs in tool invocation, context management, state persistence, multi-agent coordination, and autonomous execution.

β†’ Full analysis

πŸ” splx
AST-based style fragment extraction

Designing simplicity & taste tools for LLMs. Scan codebase β†’ extract structural patterns β†’ output natural language fragments for prompts. Novel approach: automated detection of boring code patterns (guard clauses, flat control flow, function length) to nudge LLM code generation.

β†’ Full research

🧬 Biotech Software Engineering
Career guide for bio software engineers

Comprehensive guide for software engineers entering biotech. Covers cellular factories, grown materials, software stack for bio R&D. From DNA assembly automation to fermentation scale-up, bioreactor control systems, and computational biology tooling.

β†’ Full guide

AI & LLMs

🧩 Programs that learn
18 approaches β€’ 5 concepts β€’ 10 patterns β€’ 2026-11-03

Should an LLM write a program that learns, or edit its own weights? Each approach page names one orthogonal component and one documented failure: Darwin GΓΆdel Machine, GEPA, AlphaEvolve, LLM-SR, ASI-Arch against SEAL, Titans, MEMIT, plus the substrates (SINDy, Neural ODE, Scallop, DreamCoder) and the cautionary AI Scientist audit. Same method as the Agents hub.

β†’ Full hub

Why an LLM should write a learnable program instead of editing its own weights. Darwin GΓΆdel Machine, GEPA, AlphaEvolve, LLM-SR vs SEAL, Titans, MEMIT. Substrates (JAX-MD, Neural ODEs, Pyro, SINDy), the forgetting cost, the bitter lesson, and the open lane in biology.

β†’ Full research

🧠 Self-Improving Agents
700 papers β€’ 19 research axes

Reinforcement learning for coding agents. From reward modeling to policy optimization, self-play, and continual learning. Covers RLHF, outcome-based rewards, test-driven RL, multi-agent debate, self-correction, and iterative refinement strategies.

β†’ Full research

πŸ”’ Anthropic Mythos Preview
AI cybersecurity capabilities

Analysis of Anthropic's AI-driven vulnerability discovery & exploitation capabilities. Claude Mythos autonomously discovers zero-days in major OSes and browsers. Disclosed vulnerabilities: FreeBSD NFS RCE (CVE-2026-4747), OpenBSD TCP SACK DoS, FFmpeg H.264 OOB, Linux kernel privesc chains. Over 99% remain unpatched.

β†’ Full analysis

Infrastructure & Systems

🎯 Virtue: Esoteric Languages
Brainfuck, Befunge, Whitespace, Unlambda

Compilers, interpreters, and visualizations for esoteric programming languages. Brainfuck (300-byte compiler), Befunge-93 (2D stack-based), Whitespace (only spaces/tabs/newlines), Unlambda (pure functional combinator calculus). Interactive playgrounds with step debuggers and execution traces.

β†’ Explore languages

βš–οΈ PocketBase vs Arizuko
Architectural comparison

PocketBase (SQLite + Go monolith) vs arizuko (microservice agent gateway). Trade-offs in simplicity, scaling, and agent orchestration. PocketBase optimizes for single-developer simplicity with embedded DB. Arizuko optimizes for multi-agent coordination with separate processes and IPC.

β†’ Full comparison

πŸ›‘οΈ CVE-2026-4747
FreeBSD NFS RCE β€’ 17 years old

Critical vulnerability disclosure: unauthenticated remote β†’ full root access. Stack buffer overflow (304 bytes past 128-byte buffer). No stack canary, no KASLR. Exploit uses 6-packet ROP chain to append attacker SSH key. Full autonomous discovery and exploitation by Claude Mythos in several hours.

β†’ Full technical analysis

← krons.fiu.wtf